Today was quite light for mail, which was just as well since I was on a training course all day. Down on number, the spread of subjects and senders felt the same as usual. Email probably provides a good snapshot for most of us of the preoccupations of the day, so here’s the spread in rough chronological order:
00:18 Our Provost’s Newsletter – sent to all staff and all students at UCL.
08:37 Email via CIG-E-Forum from colleague Wendy Taylor (RNIB Library), informing subscribers that the next Cataloguing and Indexing Group E-Forum takes place tomorrow and Thursday and covers social media. [These fora started last year and my colleagues Celine Carty (Cambridge University Library), Helen Williams (London School of Economics Library) and I have a paper forthcoming in the Journal of Library Metadata on UK cataloguers' experience of new cataloguing standard Resource Description and Access based on a previous E-Forum].
09:09 The latest email from a colleague about the UCLDH Events Calendar. I will spare you the details, but this administrative issue has been running the last couple of days. As recently appointed Digital Identity Manager for the Centre, I’m glad that my colleague Oliver Duke-Williams is streamlining our events listing procedures. It’s one of the many small bits of admin that we all undertake that somehow seems to be like the pot of porridge that was always full. Emails about the calendar punctuate the rest of the day.
09:31 Email via LIS-Rarebooks with the latest information on a project that is really exciting for my research community: The English Short Title Catalogue as a 21st Century Research Tool. This major resource is being redesigned, and the email informs us that the planning committee is reporting its findings on its new blog.
10:53 Email from colleague in UCL Department of Information Studies informing all staff and research students that there will be a research seminar in the department on domain ontology modelling next week. I’d like to attend this, but it will depend on other commitments.
11:19 Reference request for one of my MA LIS students. She’s already been appointed, so fortunately I can attend to the paperwork tomorrow. One of the best bits of the job is seeing students go on to good positions. #ilovemyjob
12:02 Request from colleague to advise a student from another programme.
12:27 I know America is waking up because the first of the emails comes through from RDA-L. This list covers the new international cataloguing standard, about which I’ve just finished a book. The national libraries in USA conducted tests of RDA, involving libraries across the country, and, as a result, RDA-L is fed mostly by North American colleagues.
13:07 Email from a student that I will have to answer tomorrow as it deserves more attention than I can give while attending a course. It’s from one of my dissertation students, whom I am encouraging to submit a “lightning talk” proposal for the Cataloguing & Indexing Group Conference in Sheffield in September. Students submit their dissertations 2 weeks before the conference date, so it’s ideally-timed, and I have two this year who are working on innovative topics of interest to the community, as well as one from last year who I hope will submit a full paper proposal.
Throughout the afternoon, emails cycle through the topics raised in the morning’s mailbag, as colleagues, students and collaborators chip in with their thoughts to email lists and as part of research and professional groups.
21:54 As I’m putting my Day of DH blog together, I receive an email from ProQuest to tell me that there will be an article in this month’s Update about an event of theirs at which I was one of the speakers in November. Is it OK to name me, and can I please send a picture by Thursday?
23:26 My Day of DH mail bag ends with an email from RDA-L whose subject line is so depressing I can’t bear to open it tonight: “End of the t.p. [title page]“. I assume that the sender will be raising the change from not generating statements of responsibility that are not on the title page (under the current standard, AACR2) to inserting them at will under new standard RDA. However, for a bibliographer, it sends real schadenfreude – the title page is, arguably, being replaced as an authoritative information source by metadata behind the scenes – that’s what the bots and spiders read, after all isn’t it?
Not a cheery, but certainly an appropriate point at which to close down my email client, I feel.